Talk:Deflection (chess)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
3rd example pulled
[edit]a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
8 | 8 | ||||||||
7 | 7 | ||||||||
6 | 6 | ||||||||
5 | 5 | ||||||||
4 | 4 | ||||||||
3 | 3 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | ||||||||
1 | 1 | ||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
This doesn't really seem like an example of deflection, to me, as the bishop can just back up a space and still continue to attack the knight. It's a good move, as it allows the pawn to be advanced without losing a turn, but it's not deflection:
- I don't even see how Black CAN mate.
|haosys| —Preceding undated comment added 22:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC).
- Black can mate because if White moves his bishop, ...Bxb7# happens, because Black's king defends the bishop and b8 and White's a7-pawn is in the way. But the concept of it being a deflection is bogus-c4 is NOT the only move and in fact, advancing the b-pawn also works.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)