Talk:Deb Matthews

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Ontario / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Untitled

I know Deb, she doesn't want her family history on here. 72.138.164.42 (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

She doesn't have the right to veto information that is already a matter of public record. CJCurrie (talk) 23:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe she does if it's about her. 72.138.164.42 (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe she shouldn't have become a politician then? Info about family members who are not also politicians could probably be removed, but otherwise, we aren't violating anyone's privacy. Also, who are you? How do we know you know her, and that she wants you to remove this info? Adam Bishop (talk) 08:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deb Matthews.JPG Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Deb Matthews.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Deb Matthews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited election results

This article has been reverted to include contentious election results about at least 1 living person. Under WP:BOLP the content must be removed.

@Adam Bishop Legend of 14 (talk) 20:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The results now appear to be cited. Removal is required for contentious information that is uncited or poorly cited. In this case, the citation resolves that issue. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 15:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only 1 result has a citation, unless the others have them in a different place. Legend of 14 (talk) 02:54, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claims in general

I removed several instances of uncited claims from this article that have languished for almost 2 years. This is a BLP and they should not be re-added before they are properly cited to a reliable source. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 16:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to see the blpn discussion. Legend of 14 (talk) 02:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]