Talk:Deadly Weapon
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 17 March 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Consensus not to move. Neither the nom nor the sole support !vote is based in policy; these are dismissed accordingly in the consensus determination process. That leaves the two opposes which both cite WP:DIFFCAPS, a section of the WP:AT policy page, and the applicability of that section here was not even challenged. Thus, clear consensus opposing this move. В²C ☎ 04:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Deadly Weapon → Deadly Weapon (film) – Less ambiguous title. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 22:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per established policy, WP:DIFFCAPS. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:DIFFCAPS. The hatnote on this article is sufficient. Station1 (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Deadly Weapon (disambiguation) this film is so obscure that (film) would do no harm at all. page views In ictu oculi (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Absolutely. Other things are very often capitalised and this obscure film is clearly not the primary topic for the term. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.