Talk:De-identification
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Grilledrex.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Technologies
[edit]Since we need to introduce the "de-identification" in different aspects (ex. definition,application), why there are no de-identification technologies? I am going to add a new section about two main ways of de-identification and extend the part of limits which already exists.
http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Grilledrex/sandbox, you can see what I am editing from this link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grilledrex (talk • contribs) 17:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Intro Part
[edit]Hi, I am considering moving sentences of "re-identification" to "limits". I think those sentences emphasize the "shortage" of de-identification more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grilledrex (talk • contribs) 17:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Merge with “anonymization”?
[edit]It seems to me that anonymization and de-identification refer to the same process. It seems that the article for the reverse process, called re-identification or de-anonymization are a single article, but weren’t originally and were merged (merge discussion). Should we consider merging the articles? Or is there completing evidence of their difference? Lawrence2507 (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)