Jump to content

Talk:David Germano

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Germano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Germano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete?

[edit]

I really don't think this dude warrants a Wikipedia page. I received this article as a suggested edit and believe that there is no information to impart about this man. Chhhmok (talk) 17:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. looks like someone with a big ego decided to make themselves a page on wiki who is of no importance and is not noteworthy
makes no sense to have an article like this about a random person Holydiver82 (talk) 22:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
agreed. the journal he claims to be the editor-in-chief of is now defunct (last issue was published august 2013). he has only 2 edited books and no notable contribution to tibetan scholarship as far as i can see. Latantan (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I cancelled the PROD because a quick search found a handful of papers cited by more than 100 others. This is potential evidence of meeting WP:NPROF. Next step if someone wants to delete this is have a look at WP:AFD. ~Kvng (talk) 14:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
agreed. While most of the sources of the article are self-referential his work seems to have an impact in his field. The page should stay. Tornbetween (talk) 09:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you Sangye Khandro? 2601:644:4300:6A50:3CF9:B0A1:89A:24F7 (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, but she's very pretty and seems as though she deserves her own Wikipedia page. Chhhmok (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]