Jump to content

Talk:David Daniell (author)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note

[edit]

I don't care if Shakespeare never existed in the first place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 17:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what Shakespeare has got to do with the denomination of David Daniell and Tyndale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 10:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare, William; Daniell, David (ed.): Julius Caesar. (The Arden Shakespeare.) Walton-on-Thames: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1998 --Soenke Rahn (talk) 23:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Daniell (author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The snapshots referenced on archive.org for the subject's old website are no longer available! DFH (talk) 14:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Death

[edit]

The subject died on 2016-06-01. See my edits to the article. Having here changed to living=no for the Biography template, I was puzzled why this didn't have the desired effect. I need help to fix this. First time I've encountered this. DFH (talk) 17:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted. It was the blp field that determines this. DFH (talk) 22:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wayback Machine - no longer has snapshots of the former David Daniell website

[edit]

The snapshots referenced on archive.org for the subject's old website are no longer available! DFH (talk) 14:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Daniell (author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

His known theses section

[edit]

This whole section seems to be WP:OR. It cherry-picks selected sayings and asserts that they "are often quoted by other authors". A single quotation for each – many of which are references to his own works – by no means establishes that they are "often" quoted. I'd suggest deleting the section in its entirety unless anyone wants to do some significant work on it. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]