Talk:Dartmouth and Torbay Railway

Dartmouth and Torbay Railway
Dartmouth and Torbay Railway
	Kingswear railway station
Commercial operations
Built by	Isambard Kingdom Brunel; Robert Pearson Brereton;
Original gauge	7 ft 1⁄4 in (2,140 mm) Brunel gauge; converted to; 4 ft 8+1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge in 1892
Preserved operations
Length	9.63 miles (15.50 km) (1864)
Commercial history
Opened	1859
1857	Company incorporated
1859	Opened to Paignton
1861	Opened to Brixham Road
1864	Opened throughout
1872	Absorbed by South Devon Railway
Preservation history
1972	Dart Valley Railway

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	October 28, 2021

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph of add a photo from SDR days when the D&TR existed as a legal entity be added to this article.

Infobox

Is it necessary to use the generic {{Infobox}} template? This is described as "not meant for use directly in an article" - could we use {{Infobox heritage railway}} instead, see right? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:08, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any is Infobox better than none, but this article isn't about a heritage railway! Geof Sheppard (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what about {{Infobox rail line}}? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems good to me. Geof Sheppard (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]