Talk:Daft Punk's Electroma

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Da Funk#"Fresh" video|Fresh]] The anchor (#"Fresh" video) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Movie Theme and Interpretation

The movie was not well recieved, because many people do not understand what the movie is about. The movie's theme and interpretation is about self-realization, self actualization, and self-acceptance. This should be noted within the article.(LonerXL (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Please refrain from adding unsourced interpretations to the article. That is considered original research. just64helpin (talk) 00:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sure buddy....(LonerXL (talk) 00:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Sources Not Matching Claims

See the crowd walking out of the theatre reference in the last paragraph. Neither 1 or 3 makes that claim. There are also improper citations concerning plot details. Boston2austin 12:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a reference for the "Reception" information. Just64helpin 16:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Order of text

Wouldn't it be better if the plot summary was the first section and then the history of its released? Just seems weird for the article to go right to the history of the film and then moving to the plot summary. Douglasr007 03:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how it's "weird", since the history documents the making of the film, including development of the story, which would logically lead to the finished product. Just64helpin 10:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources not matching claims 2 and writers of music

The article states that the music is not by Daft Punk. Ignoring the ambiguity of this statement (Referring to writing, production, or performance?), the referenced citation makes no mention of the music in the film, and in itself is a poorly written and largely useless article, therefore removed. An appropriate citation is required. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.30.119.203 (talk) 17:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reference was originally at the end of the preceding sentence regarding casting. This was before the film was released; since the film is now released, citation is not needed, since the film itself (specifically the end credits) can be used as a source. just64helpin (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Actually, the reference does mention the lack of Daft Punk music: "Helmers bizarrely choose not to use their own catchy tunes here, the one thing that might have given pic slim commercial legs." just64helpin (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daft Punk's Electroma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.daft-musique.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928041619/http://www.thedaftclub.com/news.php?item.15.5 to http://www.thedaftclub.com/news.php?item.15.5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]