Talk:DART Underground

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:DART Underground map.

Someone is confused

There is confusion here and in the Docklands railway station article. The current Docklands station on Sherrif street is the terminus for the Midland line has absolutely nothing to do with "the planned Docklands railway station" for the Interconnector. Admittedly, Irish rail have started referring to the proposed Interconnector station as the "station at the Docklands" instead of Spencer Dock Station which does not help but there is no connection between the proposed station for the Interconnector and the existing Docklands station. If no one objects, I will remove the link from this article to the article on the existing Midlands line station and will also ammend the last paragraph of the the latter. Jimg (talk) 13:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Work allready started?

There was news in May of work allready begining on the project. I still have a copy of the Friday 12th of May Issue of the free Herald am newspaper which claims work has started on the Interconnector. No major construction is happaning but it can be seen that track is being replaced in the spencer dock area. This track appears to be new concrete sleepers and most likely continous welded track. This are will be an important area in the future of the proposed Spencer dock station and as of yet this is the only current construction or visable effort to launch this project. 11th of September 2006 0341 am.

Alternative routes and public scrutiny

Are there alternatives to the project which could achieve the same results, or are there possible alternative routes? And has the route/project been subjected to any official scrutiny by the public? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.176.230.101 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Alternative routes from Heuston to Spencer dock are the Luas (Spencer Dock end not yet built) and the phoenix park tunnel route. The river is also a very remote possibility. I think Olivia Mitchell questioned the wisdom of the interconnector due to these alternatives. There has been no public scrutiny but there will be. Curtains99 21:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I take it when the time comes that there will need to be a couple of realistically possible routes presented to the public. If I'm not mistaken, there are EU regulations regarding this. The latest proposed route for the metro includes a station under the river at O'Connell Bridge. This would seem an obvious alternative location for integration of DART and metro, but one wonders if it is physically possible for the interconnector to be built through such a location. If it is not possible, it's hard to see how any alternative routes could be presented to the public, as may be required under EU regulations.

Luas is useless as an alternative, the main purpose of the tunnel is to increase capacity of the rail lines so that they can actually accomodate the demand they face. It is an important link between Heuston and the Docklands area as well but much more than solely that. As it stands the interconnector route is pretty much set down for engineering reasons, the curves a train can take are very long particularly compared to a tram, and the concerns about the route affecting Trinity college are of course an issue. So if they are to connect it to Stephen's Green they don't really have much choice with the route. It is always important to examine all your options but this tunnel is essential if Dublin is not to grind to a halt, no matter what Olivia Mitchell claims.

Could you point out what EU regulation specifies that alternative routes have to be presented to the public? Alternatives have been considerred years ago, including tunnelling under Connolly station but all alternatives have very obvious flaws. Jimg (talk) 13:09, 17 May 2008 (

Have you any link to these obviously flawed alternatives, jimg?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on DART Underground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irishrail.ie/about-us/dart-underground
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rte.ie/news/2011/1110/budget-business.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irishrail.ie/about-us/dart-expansion-programme
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150303205110/https://www.irishrail.ie:80/about-us/dart-underground to http://www.irishrail.ie/about-us/dart-underground

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DART Underground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]