Talk:Cyclohexene

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I agree with the first comment, the arrow pointing from the H to the H2O should point in the opposite direction, curved arrows show the movement of electrons- from nucleophile to electrophile. If this is not corrected soon, I will fix it myself. Dru007 16:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Regards, --NEUROtiker 00:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Cyclohexene/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The mechanism contains an error. In the second line, an arrow is pointing the wrong way. I also don't like the C+ in the same structure - I'd rather it were a CH+. Given that this is indeed a very common undergraduate experiment, and students often turn to wikipedia for answers, the figure should probably be corrected. If my students gave me the mechanism as shown I would mark it wrong. If I had more time to figure out how to edit here at Wikipedia, I'd do it myself. (But I don't so I will just whine about it and see if anyone else is willing to deal with it.)

Cheers,

74.98.115.246 06:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Russ[reply]

Last edited at 06:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyclohexene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070503012733/http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/D-Addit_ar-e.htm to http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/D-Addit_ar-e.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]