Jump to content

Talk:Currencies of Puerto Rico/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
To start, the lead needs to be broken up into multiple paragraphs. The entire article has many long paragraphs that can simply be split up. I didn't have time to review it all now, but what I read looks very good and well-referenced. Reywas92Talk 21:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, I'm on it. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the first issues have been attended. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I have performed a small copyedit. Nothing except they odd typo, but there were a number capitalization errors.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Thorough, exiting and well written article. No problems meeting the good article criteria. Congratulations!
Thanks for your review, sorry for the delayed response. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]