Jump to content

Talk:Crash Bandicoot (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateCrash Bandicoot (video game) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleCrash Bandicoot (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 5, 2011WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 10, 2011Good article nomineeListed
September 28, 2021Peer reviewReviewed
October 28, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 16, 2023Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Controller port

[edit]

Our Controller port is not working?

For Crash Bandicoot only? You should try deactivating analog by pressing the analog button after it starts. MIT Trekkie July 2, 2005 21:43 (UTC)

New GA nom

[edit]

The notification is up above. Please take your time to review. Thanks!! Railer-man (talk) 02:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Crash Bandicoot (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I feel that you should parse down the release information in the lead. For instance, instead of listing every date, you could merely state the regions and year of release for the original and the years of release for the re-releases. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    As much as I understand that it could prove to be limiting to remove these, I'm not sure that we should be using sources such as Crash Mania. If you could demonstrate a Rubin and Mancell's acknowledgment that these interviews occurred, I imagine that they would be usable; otherwise, I think removal may be the best option. Additionally, I noticed that you use a short paragraph for a single source, and using only Sterling as a source to demonstrate an implication that multiple critics hold this view. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The gameplay image uses a fairly redundant rationale; the lead image is for the purpose of illustrating the article. The gameplay image should be said to demonstrate elements of the article, such as its HUD and perspective. The plot image is definitely not usable, as it is purely decorative. The image only serves to show people a scene, and they are not going to have a much greater understanding of what is happening in the scene. There is no critical commentary of the scene, so there really is no good reason to use this image. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
I went ahead and fixed all of the cited problems with the article. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Everything seems to be in order. Good work. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

crash bandicoot sales

[edit]

can someone update the crash bandicoot sales figures as it must have sold well over 6.8 million since 2003. The Crash bandicoot PSN sales have sold over 1.3 million worlwide, include them as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.240.198 (talk) 13:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Best selling video game?

[edit]

I can't find any WP:RS here that states that this game is among or is the "best selling video games in the United States". Can someone please provide one? If not then I'll remove these claims. Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 21:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Misleadingly cites game creator's publicity website as non-biased source.

[edit]

Many of the references are to All-Things-Andy-Gavin.com, which is written and maintained by Andy Gavin (the game's co-creator) as a promotional tool, hence not a neutral source.

Scrapped Traditionally animated FMV opening and ending

[edit]

It was going to have a traditionally animated FMV opening and ending. [1] The theme song to the FMV opening was performed by Jim Cummings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.187.141.214 (talk) 00:46, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Lead section

[edit]

I think the article itself isn't too bad, but the lead section is too short relative to the article's length. The game's premises and reception is there in the lead, but the gameplay and development aren't summarised at all, so therefore the lead needs to be expanded. If anyone can do that, then that would be helpful. – Hounder4 12:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Development

[edit]

Would it be a good idea to split the development section into its own article? It's really, really big..... JOEBRO64 21:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At 2,400 words, I wouldn't say it's too big, and the article itself is under 50,000 bytes, so I don't think it needs splitting too badly. – Rhain 14:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]