Talk:Crankshaft position sensor

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Any suggestions?--Timpicerilo (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you forgot to put rpm in parenthesis i fixed it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.88.181.84 (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's needed is a tie in of the camshaft sensor or another article.--Timpicerilo (talk) 15:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added some categories and removed the warning.--Timpicerilo (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

can we rename this engine hjj sensor and merge this with cam shaft sensor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave2208 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Symptoms

Symptoms of a faulty crankshaft position sensors include the engine refusing to start (obviously), but also includes the engine mysteriously ceasing to run for no apparent reason, and often with no OBD code thrown; shutting off the ignition switch and starting the engine will some times work for a few minutes, or even a few days, and then the engine will suddenly quit running again. The number of failures increase as the sensor degrades. Also, there is usually no pattern regarding heat: a car might not start even if it is cold, not just fail to start if it is hot. --Desertphile (talk) 23:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a verifiable fact

This article presently has the flowing text: Some engines, such as GM's Premium V family, use crank position sensors which read a reluctor ring integral to the harmonic balancer. This is a much more accurate method of determining the position of the crankshaft, and allows the computer to determine within a few degrees the exact position of the crankshaft (and thereby all connected components) at any given time. Surely the claim for much more accuracy is not correct as it stands and needs verification and explanation. CPES (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

>Well, correct, the harmonic balancer reluctor ring should be the same part as it were before the invention of harmonic balancers... but the worst part of that it is that it is confusing mumbo jumbo... but doesn't do harm as yet... if a picture of the actual connection sensor-ring is added, the GM premium V can be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.64.6.81 (talk) 20:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crankshaft position sensor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20150309131403/http://www.prostreetonline.com/oem/crank-position-sensor to http://www.prostreetonline.com/oem/crank-position-sensor

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]