Talk:Corporate design

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2021 and 19 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Thaonguyen050300. Peer reviewers: LycheeJelly1, Kiyana929.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This wording should be cleaned up:

The flag of Germany is one example of a corporate design created by the nation of Germany because of the German federal cabinet introduced a corporate design for the German government on 2 June 1999.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corporate design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915085300/http://styleguide.bundesregierung.de/Webs/SG/DE/Print-Styleguide/Basiselemente/Farben/Primaerfarben/primaerfarben.html to http://styleguide.bundesregierung.de/Webs/SG/DE/Print-Styleguide/Basiselemente/Farben/Primaerfarben/primaerfarben.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Brand

I’m redirecting this to Brand. I have reviewed all paragraphs here, and one or more of the following concerns applies to each:

the content reads like an essay
the content reads like a how-to
the content is unsourced
better coverage already exists at either Brand or Corporate identity

In case there was a retention-worthy version of this article that could be restored, I have reviewed a dozen previous versions of this article from points spanning the decade and a half the article has existed. The strongest version I found was a two-sentence stub from 2007.

I have not accessed hard copies of non-web-based references, but the nature of their titles in combination with the types of statements they supporting makes me confident that the citations need not be retained.

Corporate identity also has tone issues, so Brand seems like the best possible redirect target.

—jameslucas ^{▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄} 12:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]