Talk:Comparison of force-field implementations
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Who supports the old OPLS UA?
[edit]Who else? --P99am (talk) 12:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Comparison of force field implementations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101010131115/http://www.biomolecular-modeling.com/Abalone/ to http://www.biomolecular-modeling.com/Abalone/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Notable software packages
[edit]As the list is only for notable software, I will soon start cleaning out the list. All software without an own article will then be removed, as deemed non-notable. The Banner talk 01:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have no problem with that, although I think HyperChem is worthy of an article. Perhaps you could keep that one to remind people to write such an article. I do not have the time to research it sufficiently at present. --Bduke (talk) 01:59, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- List-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- List-Class software articles of Low-importance
- List-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- List-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- List-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- List-Class Chemistry articles
- Low-importance Chemistry articles
- WikiProject Chemistry articles