Talk:Come On In! The Water's Pink

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 November 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Animation portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
	This redirect is supported by the American animation work group.
	This redirect is supported by the Animated films work group.

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Untitled

Doesn't seem of enough importance to merit it's own article, are there other episodes scattered about that could be merged into a list, or should it just be removed? --feba 03:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If enough articles have written synopses, I think it would be a great way to recap the series. Successful articles on individual episodes have been written for other TV series. But if we do this, they have to be written better than this one is now. --Goldrushcavi 20:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]