Talk:Colpoda

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Microbiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

I can hardly claim to be an expert on this subject, and , in accordance with the ban on original research, I am providing references where possible. John Elson (talk) 14:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Species

Now that there is a list of species the original comment about about Colpoda inflata and other species seems redundant. John Elson (talk) 05:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colpidium

The section Uses by man includes a reference (and an associated sentence) about the species "Colpidium colpoda". I think it should be deleted because Colpidium is not the same genus as Colpoda.--Miguelferig (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that there is such a species as " Colpidium colpoda", it could be that this was meant to refer to both genera. Perhaps a little more research is needed on this one. John Alan Elson★ WF6I A.P.O.I. 02:10, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colpoda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716074144/http://www.soc.nii.ac.jp/jsproto/journal/jjp37/119-126.pdf to http://www.soc.nii.ac.jp/jsproto/journal/jjp37/119-126.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]