Talk:Colias hyale
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
"Small" is an unhelpful term – there are plenty of smaller butterflies
[edit]I have nothing in my guide books on the size. Can you help? If you can't I'd suggest putting back the "small" so at least there is a certain size reference point.Viren (talk) 03:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Viren, it's not an easy question! First, the Lepidoptera vary in wingspan over 2 orders of magnitude, from 3mm or less in some leaf miners to 280mm for the largest birdwings. The smallest butterflies are 12mm in span. I'd prefer to describe the size explicitly (as I did in the Euplagia quadripunctaria article) without commenting on it.
- So, how to proceed? If we could agree on Wikipedia what constituted a "very small", "small", "medium", "large" or "very large" lepidopteran, then perhaps we could apply our categories across the board. Even so, we might find that some people (e.g. in Britain, where the extremes of size range less widely) object to calling a particular species "medium-sized", if it happens to be the largest in the BI. And would we need a different scale for the butterflies and the moths? (The small blue for example is the smallest British butterfly, but is a pretty average size for a moth.)
- However, this is a debate for the Lepidoptera Project as a whole, not for one species ... hence my comment. Perhaps we should include a 'standardised' size measurement (the moth guides seem to agree on forewing length) for every lepidopteran article? --Wally Tharg (talk) 09:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Colias hyale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130701003239/http://globis.insects-online.de/species&s=7806 to http://globis.insects-online.de/species%26s%3D7806
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)