Talk:ColdFusion Markup Language

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ColdFusion Markup Language article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

On merging Features section from ColdFusion to ColdFusion Markup Language

As chair of the CFML Advisory Committee, I want to address the suggestion of merging the features section from the Adobe ColdFusion page to this CFML page. CFML should be used to refer to core language features only. Vendor-specific features should remain on the page discussing that vendor's implementation of CFML. What constitutes "core language" for CFML is currently being determined by the committee so it is premature to start merging content on these two pages.

Once the committee has published its specification of core vs vendor-specific language features (which should happen by the end of 2008), we can start to expend the CFML page to cover core language and ensure that other vendor-specific pages refer to the core CFML page as well as providing documentation of their own extensions on their own pages. Seancorfield (talk) 18:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a very good approach, and I wholeheartedly agree. 128.250.176.68 (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could the website be dropped because thats the Adobe CF Site, the railo and BD sites are not linked. Not having this would be the ideal. Also the developer section could well do with being dropped? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.76.131 (talk) 09:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that a shake up of the pages is needed , but I think we need to remember that ColdFusion and CFML are, as subjects (despite being linked ) two separate entities, ColdFusion as a server side Programming Language(CFML) and the web technology that powers it, i think that it should be a single (or linked) page with references and titles exlaining wyhich sections are dealing with which area.- James Crawford —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.49.98 (talk) 10:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article should cover the CFML language (syntax,semantics,etc) and nothing else. The history section should be dropped (information there belongs in the respective engine's pages). The rest of the page needs a complete overhaul, and in particular should be giving equal footing to script syntax (which currently is briefly mentioned then forgotton about). I added a link to Mike Henke's "CFML in 100 minutes" tutorial, because that's currently a far better representation of CFML than this page (although it is a tutorial, rather than an encylopaedic article, which is what this page needs to become). -- Peter Boughton (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on ColdFusion Markup Language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Cfml" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cfml. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 26#Cfml until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. — WILDSTAR^talk 09:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"CFML" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CFML. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 26#CFML until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. — WILDSTAR^talk 10:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]