Talk:Cleburne, Texas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Dallas-Fort Worth (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cleburne, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changed newly added statue photo to namesake photo

I noticed a recent change to the page. The sole change was that a photo of the statue of Patrick Cleburne was added and captioned. As there are no other landmarks, statues, or memorials on the page (other than downtown Cleburne in the history section), it felt out of place and appears more as an attempt to use Wikipedia as more than just an information source.

Looking into the account that made the change, it appears to have been created very recently, describing itself as being from the Irish Midlands, and has only a recent history of posts on June 12, 16, and 17, with one or two line and/or photo edits across a number of articles. This came across as a possible influence operation, and aside from that did not flow well with the rest of the page.

It also may be due to Patrick Cleburne's Irish heritage and not an influence campaign.

Even so, a photo of the man fits with the flow of the page and conforms more to informational than a photo of a statue that may detract from the page's purpose as informative.

Instead of removing it altogether, I changed the photo of the statue to a photo and link to Patrick Cleburne, as I believe it would be more neutral appropriate to the rest of the page and still maintain the town's link with it's namesake for visitors to find easily. This change allows visitors to see the photo as well as a link in the caption to go to his page. This does not hide the fact that the he was a Confederate General, but also does not overtly use Wikipedia (a neutral information source) as a possible platform for inducing strife, division, and/or conflict. -- CyberNigma (talk) 17:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]