This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
I moved the second image (recreation site) down and to the right to eliminate the text sandwich created by placing the second image on the top left. MOS:IMAGES says in part, "Avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other." The underlying problem here is that the article is too short to accommodate two images neatly, but stacking is slightly better than left-right. Finetooth (talk) 17:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Usually with short articles it's better to create a commons category and link to that in the external links section rather than put more than one image in. (Or else expand the article!) That said, I've moved the image to the left in the blank space after the refs to tone down the unbalanced look of the page. That way the image won't get overlooked. Valfontis (talk) 22:19, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
