Talk:ClamTk

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ClamTk article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

No longer maintained by current maintainer

No longer maintained #163 https://github.com/dave-theunsub/clamtk/issues/163 Chas4 (talk) 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Development of article subject with regards to past tense.

I have reverted @TheTechyOne's article wide update to use past tense (http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=ClamTk&oldid=1226273084) not only because ClamTk ongoing development is ambiguous (the developer doesn't rule out resuming development), but also because 'not maintained' is not equivelent to non-existance. For instance, ClamTK still has all the described features, maintained or not, and regardless of the developers decision to retire, the software is still widely distributed and in use. James Bateaux (talk) 14:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incase anyone isn't aware (like myself 20mins ago), MOS:PRESENT covers this convention.

"Always use present tense for verbs that describe genres, types, and classes, even if the subject of the description (e.g. program, library, device) no longer exists, is discontinued, or is unsupported/unmaintained." (emphasis added) James Bateaux (talk) 16:04, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]