Talk:Chukwu
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Needs Proper References and General Cleanup
[edit]For all the claims of this article, very few are sourced. Proper sources need to be added in the current sections, and more revisions will need to be made for syntax and clarity. Once this is complete, more detailed information, including Chukwu mythology, may be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebaitgoat (talk • contribs) 15:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Kola nut scarifice
[edit]Igbo Guide has a section on the kola nut ceremony, which may be useful. All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 17:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC).
Chukwu Not God Almighty
[edit]Before the English religion came to Igbo land, the Igbos believed in Chikwu Abiama, their supreme deity. This deity is similar to Baal of the Canaanites, who possessed the same attributes. Read also King Jaja of OPOBO - A novel 105.113.32.23 (talk) 08:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is totally wrong. I am an Igbo and Chukwu as well as Chineke are names for the Almighty God in Igbo. Please stop misleading people! 41.190.2.81 (talk) 17:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- This seems like a common story that I keep encountering all over the world - practitioners of local traditional religions have been accused by Christians and Muslims of being polytheists and told that this is a bad thing, so they react by trying to prove that they actually are and always have been 'lofty' monotheists just like Christians and Muslims, if not more so, thereby actually revising and misrepresenting their own religions. This article is especially funny by mentioning the etymology of the word 'God' - 'see, your English word originally meant some kind of pathetic pagan idol, whereas ours is the truly monotheistic word, so we are more monotheists than you are!' All of this results from the uncritical acceptance of the initial presumption of the foreigners that monotheism is better in the first place. But even if I am right in suspecting that the claims here are misguided and historically inauthentic revisionism, it is quite possible that they have already found their way into what passes for reliable sources and hence have to stay in the article according to Wikipedia policy. Accordingly, I have placed [citation needed] tags in places where citations of such sources can be added.--62.73.69.121 (talk) 10:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)