Talk:Childers Reforms

Military history: British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

"Tribal"

Perhaps "tribal" could be defined with a few salient examples. Varlaam (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Childers Reforms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060721170842/http://www.regiments.org:80/regiments/uk/volmil-england/vinf-ea/hg-cycl.htm to http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/volmil-england/vinf-ea/hg-cycl.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Childers Reforms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061230000924/http://www.regiments.org:80/regiments/uk/lists/ba1881pr.htm to http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/lists/ba1881pr.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regulation of the Forces Act (bill 193) Passed 27 Aug 1881

Some pertinent text from the Act

10 Provision for Supplemental Reserve

(1) For the purpose of establishing a Supplemental Reserve it shall be lawful for Her Majesty to authorise men to be enrolled in the first class of the army reserve force under the condition that they are not called out for permanent service until the whole of the remainder of the said first class have been called out for permanent service, and regulations may from time to time be made under the Reserve Force Act 1876 for carrying into effect this section.

This introduced Section D of the Army Reserve, to supplement Section A and Section B men still serving their time on their 12 year contracts.Keith H99 (talk) 16:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly of interest

13 Removal of doubts as to pensions of army reserve men.

Whereas by the Reserve Force Act, 1867, the Secretary of State has power to make regulations respecting the pensions of men belonging to the army reserve force:

And whereas doubts have arisen as to whether the pensions payable to men in pursuance of those regulations can in all cases be awarded and paid by the Commissioners of Chelsea Hospital, and it is expedient to remove such doubts; be it therefore enacted as follows:—

Where, either before or after the passing of this Act, a man in the army reserve force has been called out for permanent service, and at the termination of such service has been returned to the army reserve force, and has become entitled to pension under any regulation by the Secretary of State, made either before or after the passing of this Act, or before or after such calling out or return, then the Commissioners of Chelsea Hospital shall have the same power to award and pay the said pension, and otherwise in relation to the said pension, as they would have if such man had been discharged from the army on reduction.

I had neglected to insert this other clause. Now, both of the clauses that amended the Regulation of the Forces Act 1871 can be read above. Keith H99 (talk) 06:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should the "later changes" section mention the cavalry amalgamations of 1921-22?

Currently, as far as I'm aware, it only gets a few lines in Cavalry regiments of the British Army. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 08:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]