Talk:Chen Shimei and Qin Xianglian

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chen Shimei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723132529/http://www.cnpoc.cn/en/jumuinfo.asp?NID=249 to http://www.cnpoc.cn/en/jumuinfo.asp?NID=249

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merge

Suggest merging this article with Qin Xianglian. They're effectively on the same topic and can be covered in one article. Banedon (talk) 01:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and the merged article should be named as Chen Shimei & Qin Xianglian, Qin Xianglian & Chen Shimei, or The Case of Chen Shimei.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 02:04, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to a common name and

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 08:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of the popular culture section to the article

Serok Ayris can you explain what the text currently in the popular culture section has to do with Chen Shimei and Qin Xianglian? Banedon (talk) 01:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, many other media pages on this wiki have sections about popular culture and this page is no different. It’s probably why most people even know about it in the first place so it’s useful to include Serok Ayris (talk) 17:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand - currently the text has no relation to Chen Shimei and Qin Xianglian. Why is it in this article instead of Blaxy Girls? Banedon (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It does have relation, the lines themselves come from it and it is on the Blaxy girls page, I think it would be useful to include it if someone wants to know the origin of where the lines in the song come from Serok Ayris (talk) 02:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying 近前看其详上写着秦香莲年三十二岁那状告当朝驸马郎欺君王瞒皇上那悔婚男儿招东床 comes from the Chen Shimei and Qin Xianglian opera? If so what does it mean and why does the meme focus on it? Banedon (talk) 02:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what it means but it is related to the meme because it came from the Blaxy Girls remix with the line taken from it. The meme mostly just focuses on it because it’s Chinese Serok Ayris (talk) 02:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So is there a relation between the meme and this opera at all? Or is the meme focusing on all Chinese songs/operas/etc? If there is no relation then surely it should not be included in this article. Banedon (talk) 03:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information on historical origin is self-contradictory

The "history" section of the page informs us that the character of Chen Shimei, including the mythological names of his children, was already established in a book published in 1594 or 1595.

It also informs us that the character originates from the historical official Chen Shumei, who served in the Qing dynasty. This second claim is helpfully cited to an article in The Epoch Times which identifies this as "China's last dynasty", leaving no room for ambiguity. The only problem with this is that the Qing dynasty began in 1644, 49 years after we know the story was already current.

Given that the Epoch Times article does not itself cite any documents or support of any kind, perhaps the references to Chen Shumei and Qin Xinlian should be removed from the Wikipedia article and the sidebar? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CC00:9290:1942:EA2:A241:23CA (talk) 21:50, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]