Talk:Chemometrics

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

not a place for advertising

I know there are lots of companies that provide chemometrics software - but these can easily be found by searching the Internet - Wikipedia is not the place to do it no matter how good you think your company is. The only place it would be acceptable to link to a company's website is on a page about that company itself. There is no need for a long list here. Cheers, --Amaher (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"For example near-infrared spectra, which are extremely broad and non-selective compared to other analytical techniques (such as infrared or Raman spectra), can often be used successfully in conjunction with carefully developed multivariate calibration methods to predict concentrations of analytes in very complex matrices."

Where is this established? Who says this? Needs a paper or book cite for this comment to hold water. I think some might disagree all together... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.237.152.54 (talk) 21:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should Pharmacophores be referenced from here?

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Pharmacophore

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chemometrics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]