Talk:Cheeky Angel

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

First header

I was just wondering if anyone had seen the anime "Cheeky Angel." I have just recently started watching it and think its a very good show. Everything about it is very good. The plot is very interesting and the characters are so cool. I think its a super show and I wonder what other people think of it.

Hello guys, I have to cut the spoilers part because it's just TOO dangerous for first-time viewers of Tenshi na Konamaiki. Hope you understand. 61.9.74.35 08:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cutting the spoilers

The spoilers by the way are heavily RELATED to the ending of the series and I just don't want people to be spoiled in viewing it. Thank you.61.9.74.35 08:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cutting spoilers is fine, but don't strip the article naked. The main character descriptions should have farm more than 2 lines of text.... Especially for a popular anime —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.235.12 (talk) 07:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a Discussion

I was wondering if theres a dicussion page where poeple who've seen all the anime can talk about it. cuz there are a few things i from the ending that i was wondering if others got too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enixspirit (talk • contribs) 19:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Story section is misleading

I won't go into details because it would spoil the story, but the Story section should be re-written because it is misleading and inaccurate. If I can find the time I will write up a revision, but that might take a while, mainly because it won't be simple to write a Story line that isn't a spoiler.

I put this here because, I am not sure how to put it in the main article, either as original research, or a clear precis. It is VERY misleading. Megumi Amatsuka was NEVER a boy. She wanted to be a boy so that she could protect her friend, so she acted like a boy. This is confirmed at the end of the Manga where she says that she didn't think that she was ever a boy, and her friend (Miki) said that she definitely hadn't ever been a boy. The Anime, which is based on the Manga, doesn't make this clear. So, what was going on with her perception that she had been changed to a girl? Perhaps it was the realisation that she could not hide this any more, and she rationalised it as her masculinity having been stolen. Kuitan (talk) 14:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheeky Angel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5vS3xHqpF?url=http://comics.shogakukan.co.jp/mangasho/rist.html to http://comics.shogakukan.co.jp/mangasho/rist.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]