Jump to content

Talk:Charlotte Mecklenburg Library

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wifi

[edit]

Just to clarify, the checkit branch does not have wifi access nor does it have publicly accessible internet computers. I;ve gone ahead and changed the wording. Feel free to modify if it doesn't read right. --Drmike (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Layoffs

[edit]

I've made a couple of changes to clarify the layoff situation. The eventual layoffs were not 82-84 people, but 82-84 full time equivalents. If two people working 20 hours were laid off, that was counted as one full time equivalent. This meant that, as many of the staff laid off are part time, in total 120 people lost their jobs. Lamuella (talk) 16:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Main library.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
  • File:Main library.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
  • File:ML 2ndfloor.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
  • File:ML carolina room.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Main library.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems

[edit]

This article is obviously excessively detailed, and past contributions contain copyvios from the library's website, specifically this page. Such edits (like this one) came from what appears to be the library's IP. I'm going to remove those edits, and let the chips fall where they may, and then I am going to go through and trim drastically. An encyclopedic article should not contain a play-by-play of budget decisions, annex closings, appointments, and decisions--not unless they have secondary sources verifying their notability. Drmies (talk) 19:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to have happened again. Marked as such. --168.215.131.150 (talk) 21:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

168.215.131.150

[edit]

Be aware that any changes to this page from this IP address is made by either a patron or an employee of the library. This is the proxy IP address assigned to the library system. --168.215.131.150 (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Mecklenburg Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]