Talk:Château de Montmorency (Val-d'Oise)

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 28 February 2020

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move, after extended time for discussion. BD2412 T 02:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Château de Montmorency (Val-d'Oise) → Château de Montmorency – A less cluttered name which was originally given to the less important Château de Montmorency (Montigny-en-Ostrevent) which I renamed with the bracket content. All 2 (!) correct links to the Montigny château have been updated, so there will not be a conflict. Gerbis (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. Jerm (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. I don't object to the proposed move, but I think the current names are fine, especially since Château de Montmorency (Montigny-en-Ostrevent) is about a château that still exists, while Château de Montmorency (Val-d'Oise) is about one that has essentially disappeared, even though historically speaking it was more important. --Robert.Allen (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. No clear primary topic here. Especially given the latter still exists and the former doesn't. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.