Talk:Celtis occidentalis

Photo of leaves needed

It would be better to have the leaves description and picture section above the bark section, since a lot of people will, like me, be visiting to try to identify the tree from the shape of the leaves and how they're positioned on the branch.

On that: there ought to be a picture that clearly shows how the leaves (which are not distinctively shaped and so don't immediately identify it) are positioned alternating on the branch/twig rather than right across from each other, as with an ash tree. I couldn't find a federal govt. no-copyright picture or I would have added it. editeur24 (talk) 22:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized I could take a photo myself and upload it, so I did that and made the changes I requested in my Talk comment above. editeur24 (talk) 23:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sugarberry

This article first says that this species can be called the sugarberry, and then that it is often confused with the sugarberry (a different species). Perhaps some clarification? Equinox (talk) 03:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celtis occidentalis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090610073223/http://www.clarywoodproducts.com:80/lumbercat.cfm to http://www.clarywoodproducts.com/lumbercat.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Range of coverage

I live in Austin, TX and I have recently discovered that we have a new hackberry tree out in our front yard. It just sprung up this year.

We were warned about it from our Austin Water guy who came out to check our meter.

In particular, he warned me that they make an unholy mess, partly because of the berries themselves, but also partly because of all the birds that are attracted to them and then shit all over the place. And that also draws a hellspawn of flies. He strongly recommended we cut it down and drill out the stump and pour in lots of stump killer to make sure it never comes back. Clearly, he has had some bad experiences with them.

So, even if you don't want to update the page relating to the nuisance they cause, you might at least want to mention that they can also be found in Texas. 75.13.92.183 (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As can be seen in the map of native range, C. occidentalis is native in North Dakota, not just South Dakota. There is also a small isolated pocket as far north as the southern end of Lake Manitoba. This species thrives in USDA zone 3 but needs zone 4 conditions to produce ripe fruit. The warming climate is expanding the range northward. A tree at 1115 Polson Avenue in Winnipeg has produced ripe fruit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:AF84:1C00:A515:32AD:6DE0:304B (talk) 10:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Celtis occidentalis is listed as a tree native to Manitoba, Canada. See pp 52-53 Field Guide Trees of Manitoba

https://www.gov.mb.ca/nrnd/forest/pubs/forest_lands/field_guide.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:AF84:1C00:A515:32AD:6DE0:304B (talk) 11:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]