Talk:Celestine (mineral)

Gemology and Jewelry: Gemstones Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Gemstones subpage.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Celestine (mineral) is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocks and minerals Low‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Celestine (mineral) is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

If "celestine" is the accepted name, shouldn't this page be moved to an article with that title, and have "celestite" redirect to "celestine"? - An anonymous user

The caption of the picture reads celestine: is this a typing error, or an accepted alternative spelling? Physchim62 12:02, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Er... second sentence ... :-) Vsmith 12:58, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Quite clearly you are correct, mysterious user. This is retarded. I don't know who called it celestite in the first place, it's obviously the creation of a recursive reference to its original name or a spelling error. MrAngy 03:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retarded? The mineral is called celestite in a variety of standard mineralogy texts and celestine in others. The IMA in 2004 (see 2nd sentence) recently decreed that the celestine spelling was to be the official name: accepting the Mineralogical Magazine 36 (1967), p135 use as celestine and rejecting the Mineralogical Magazine 43 (1980), p1053 use as celestite. Thus officially it is celestine although still commonly referred to also a celestite. I think it was a European vs US usage dispute, but not sure about that. Currently the celestine link takes one to a disambig page, so if the article is to be renamed that would need changing also - not really a big deal, and I'll probably get around to it some time - but not tonight. More importantly, the article needs to be improved and references added - as a good article is more important in my view than a trivial name dispute. Right now it's bedtime, so ... maybe tomorrow. Cheers, Vsmith 03:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biological use

See: On the celestite-secreting Acantharia and their effect on seawater strontium to calcium ratios 131.111.30.21 (talk) 10:37, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cleavage ???

As I know as well as on mindat.org, the cleavage is "Perfect On {001} perfect; on {210} good; on {010} poor. Also reported on {011}" Why here it is said "Perfect on one crystal face parallel to long axis (001), and nearly perfect on a second face (110)" ? Nghia1991ad (talk) 09:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed per Handbook of Mineralogy. Just do it :) Vsmith (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Americans,

I have just modified one external link on Celestine (mineral). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080530134400/http://www.geo.vu.nl/users/ima-cnmmn/MINERALlist.pdf to http://www.geo.vu.nl/users/ima-cnmmn/MINERALlist.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]