Talk:Causes of karma in Jainism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Causes of karma in Jainism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Jainism Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Manual of Style – Naming conventionsJainismWikipedia:WikiProject JainismTemplate:WikiProject JainismJainism articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Because the concept is common among four major religions (Jainism, Buddhism, Hinduism and Sikhism), shouldn't the name of the article specify that it only deals with Jain perspectives on the causes of Karma? Gizza^Discuss ^© 02:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The whole idea of having a seperate article on Causes of Karma was on account of complex and detailed treatment given to this particular subject in Jainism. On the other hand the other traditions do not give such a lengthy treatment on causes and types of karma. It would make more sense to have named the article as Causes of Karma (Jainism) had we had articles on causes of karma of other traditions. Anyway, at the start of article it is clear that this article is about Jain karmioc theory. But I am open to suggestion. If more people suggest and if it is proved that it caused confusion then we can reconsider renaming the article. Thanks.--Anish (talk) 05:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Causes of karma in Jainism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060722002023/http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/F005SECT1 to http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/F005SECT1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]