Talk:Burlington (provincial electoral district)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Ontario / Electoral districts Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Burlington (provincial electoral district). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Election Results added

I updated the election results section with the certified results from 2022. It's my first time using that template so if someone can review and confirm I did it correctly I would appreciate. Thanks!

Flynn58 (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad, but the swing is not correct. It should be the average change of the top two parties ([A+-B]/2). -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made that correction, the average between +2.10 and +4.81 was 3.455 so I changed the Swing to 3.46 to match the two decimal place rounding. Glad to help! --Flynn58 (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the swing should be around ~ -1.4 It should be 2.1+-4.81. Because the Liberals had a better swing than the Tories, it should be a negative number. -- Earl Andrew - talk 19:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]