Talk:Buddha in a Traffic Jam

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

In-line citations need to be provided

This article needs to have in-line citations provided. Easier to rewrite from scratch. Would that be ok? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 10:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please go ahead. The article needs to be rewritten anyway to conform to WP:NPOV. - Managerarc™^talk 04:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Urban Naxals

I propose that the book about the film is contained in a section of the article about the film. The article about the film is not too long, and the book about the film written by the director is clearly on topic. The notability of the book on it's own is questionable (questioned by Fyddlestix). It probably does not fulfill the requirements of WP:NB. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, I'd support a merge. Fyddlestix (talk) 11:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merged. Keeping Urban Naxals as a redirect and for attribution. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:50, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This book will require a separate article in my opinion. But I would request opinion of other experienced editors for the same. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 04:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

This page has been impressively vandalized into a propaganda piece in favour of the film. Each of the links in the critical reception section point to a negative review, but are written up as if they were positive, with much higher ratings than the film actually got. I guess I'll clean some of that shit up. JoAnne Tagonism (talk) 06:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]