Talk:Broomielaw

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have removed the {{prod}} tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 23:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At present the page just says it is a street in Glasgow, which is hardly informative. If you feel so strongly about it, can you not add some meaningful and encyclopaedic content? That would be a more positive way forward. Afterbrunel (talk) 07:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added very exact external links that describe Brumelaw in great detail, also internal links explaining all technical terms. I have done so because I have always been worried since Wee Johnny's lost his jaurie doon the Broomielaw Kildwyke (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Broomielaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121218075944/http://www.clydewaterfrontheritage.com:80/broomielaw.aspx to http://www.clydewaterfrontheritage.com/broomielaw.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Song.

The area also features in the folk song "Johnnie's Lost His Jorry" about a boy losing his favourite marble "doon the gundy (drain) doon The Broomielaw". Another version of the song exists in the Tyneside area where "Geordie" loses his "Penker" down the "double raw". In both cases, after causing great destruction he finds his marble in his pocket. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.242.93 (talk) 16:49, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]