Talk:British twenty-five pence coin

Numismatics: British currency Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British currency task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

28.28 g (0.9975 ounce avoirdupois, 0.9092 oz troy)

Another prime example of why the world needs to eradicate imperial measures!

"28.28 g (0.9975 ounce avoirdupois, 0.9092 oz troy)"

I don't understand that at all, what on earth is an "avoirdupois" ounce? Isn't the Troy ounce bad enough as it is? I'm amending this be only show its weight in metric and troy imperial. If anyone objects then feel free to reverse the change and explain why. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Delta-NC (talk • contribs) 04:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Ounce#International_avoirdupois_ounce --164.36.38.240 (talk) 09:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1980 issue image

I don't know why the images of individual issues have been removed but I have added a photo of the 1980 issue from my own collection. It's not a very good photo, I know, but at least something. Especially with this issue, I think, the phrase "bows and lions" deserves a visual help for those of us who don't benefit from having English as our mother tongue. --88.101.185.82 (talk) 19:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

People trying to pass off older twenty-five pence coins as five pound coins?

This seems like a dubious assertion, given that both the 25p coin and the £5 coin are commemorative and highly unlikely to be spent. Anybody who has one almost certainly bought it at above face value, after all. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 01:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]