Talk:Bradypodicola
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Readers of this article want to know...
[edit]First, thanks for writing this article. I'm very happy. I offer the following in the hopes of being helpful, so please don't understand me to be complaining. I am just curious. So, there are two kinds of Sloth Moth? Or this one is called the "sloth moth" and the other isn't? It seems strange, you'd think both would be called "sloth moths" How about a sentence that says "there are two species of sloth moth, this one, which is found only on this sloth, and that one, which is found on that sloth" or some such? How closely related are(n't) these sloth moths? They seem to be different genea, how far up the branch on the tree of life are we going to have to go to find a common ancestor? If you follow my drift. How simmilar are the two sloth moths? You'd think if they both had basically the same lifestyle for millions of years, even if they evolved from very different moths, they'd have reached basically the same body plan because of convergent evolution by now. These things would be very interesting to read about the sloth moths. They seem very mysterious. I wouldn't mind reading that "no one knows much about these moths" if that's the case. "Alsmost nothing is known about X" is an important thing to say about somethi9ng in an article if it's true, because it just means that here is a notable thing that needs study. Some grad student will read that and look into it and write a paper. Grad students often are casting about for an interesting thing to study. Chrisrus (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sloth moth delinked from species and no longer a disambig page. Hope this helps. AshLin (talk) 08:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bradypodicola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006084857/http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx to http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC)