Jump to content

Talk:Bradfield College

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

assessed by Victuallers 11:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Old Bradfieldians without articles

[edit]

The following were referenced in the Notable Old Bradfieldians section, but did not currently have their own article on Wikipedia. Bearing in mind that the editor inserting them into this article is asserting their notability (read the section title), they really should have created at least a reasonable stub article for the person first.

I've moved these references. Please free to move them back once they are no longer red-links. -- Chris j wood 14:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no requirement for links to be blue links. I have restored those here that I added, since all have an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography and if the DNB considers them notable then so should Wikipedia. A red link is certainly no indication of lack of notability, only of lack of an article. I would suggest that confusing the two is a bad idea, particularly considering the number of borderline non-entity modern day "celebrities" who do have an article and the number of notable historical figures who (as yet) do not. -- Necrothesp 23:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hum. A little history here. I tried adding stubs for several of these, only to have the resulting stubs speedy deleted as non-notable persons. I don't run to a DNB subscription, so I was unable to quote their references in my stubs, something which may well (as you say) have saved those stubs from deletion. The real problem (which on reflection I didn't explain at all well above) is that links like this are (without some out-of-band knowledge, like your access to the DNB) indistinguishable from vanity insertions on totally non-notable persons.
On reflection I have no real problem with these being red-links provided there is some kind of justification somewhere that they are indeed notable and not just vanity references. To me the obvious way to provide that justification would be to write a stub article, and quote the DNB there as a reference. Alternatively I guess simply quoting it as a reference against the redlink is acceptable too. Since you obviously have access to DNB and have done the necessary research to locate the entries, would it be too much to ask that you put that research to the benefit of all by doing one or other. -- Chris j wood 13:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Student’s Low-down on the Houses (2006)

[edit]

Hum. Pretty sure somebody is going to delete this section as cruft, or original research, or something, sooner or later. But I feel I've already played the censor on this article enough, and isn't healthy for one editor to do this alone. So I won't.

In the meantime, if you are the (anon) author of this section, I'd suggest you take a look at some other articles, and see if you can express the same information in a more encyclopaedic way. -- Chris j wood 10:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{The Student’s Low-down on the Houses (2006)|This needs sorting}}

That section in it's current state should be deleted. However anyone who knows about the school want to try and save it by making it a short piece on those houses?

--Charlesknight 13:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK I've edited out the NPOV material as best I could - remember when adding/editing it should be understandable by people who know nothing about the school.

--Charlesknight 13:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure this section is instructive or informative. Perhaps a list of houses and housemasters or mistress’s?


Yes that would make sense - just the house and the current "manager". --Charlesknight 14:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

[edit]

Another private school page that reads like a dismal apology. Amazed there isn't more on their academic results. This page really needs rejigging.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bradfield College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bradfield_College&oldid=1206408934"