Talk:Bourne Publishing Group

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stamford (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stamford, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StamfordWikipedia:WikiProject StamfordTemplate:WikiProject StamfordStamford articles

Unsigned AfD Comment

I feel that this page holds vital information about a small publisher who is based in a historic market town in Lincolnshire. Stamford often appears in TV shows and Films in the UK and its attractions are already well documented on Wikipedia. My page is simply providing information about a publisher who is not based in London, I am not attempting to promote anything and the page simply provides information about a number of class leading magazine titles. Why is this up for speedy deletion in the first place? thankyou

Removing of Tags

Once again all the editing tags have been removed without discussion on this talkpage. The article does not have ANY references(WP:CITE), the article needs to be written within the guidelines of WP:MOS, there are few if any relevant internal links. Blanket removing of all edit links without gaining consensus is not inline with WP:CON. I am replacing the edit templates until these items are addressed.--«JavierMC»|Talk 16:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I jus mangaed to revert a removed tags so they are starting it again

Alexnia (T) @ 19:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

I added one reference concerning the Your Dog and Your Cat magazines, but it lacks third party verification. It was cited from the Bourne Publishing Group website. Referencing statements made in the article need to be cited in this manner, but using third party references are preferable WP:SOURCES.--«JavierMC»|Talk 19:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too Advert like

Bit Advert like as mainly on the titles published. Agree with need for independent refs to verify notability, else every small Co in the contry (world) could have an article. how about press reports citing sponsorship deal as a start. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 17:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assesment

See http://simonwhaleytutor.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/all-change_02.html for a name change in 2012. I seriously doubt whether notability has been established, and would support an afd. But to give it a chance I have added some other projects in case anyone there can help--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bourne Publishing Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050212072706/http://www.bournepublishinggroup.co.uk:80/ to http://www.bournepublishinggroup.co.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]