Talk:Boris Rotman

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 11 October 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Referencing issues

This BLP still lacks in-line citations for many of its claims, while indulging in overcitation in the lead.

The Education section has no references.

Without additional references, it's somewhat unclear whether the editor who added the {{original research}} template had some specific criticism in mind or was guessing about the way some of the body text was worded and not clearly referenced. We would not generally recite here the claims made in primary research papers; information about the importance of the research should come from secondary sources.

If no better reference can be found for it, or more notable awards, I would probably drop the final Awards section. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]