Talk:Bob Fires the Kids

Bob Fires the Kids has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 13, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Animation: Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bob Fires the Kids/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 97198 (talk · contribs) 13:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'll be reviewing this article. Here are just a few issues I found and some suggestions for improvement:

received positive reviews from critics, who praised its combination of subplots involving the Belcher parents and children, as well as Hader's performance as Mickey – a summary of the reviews in the lead could mention "drew positive comparisons to The Simpsons". I'm also not sure about the last clause, since the critics seemed to enjoy Mickey's character rather than Hader's performance specifically.
- Reworded slightly; incorporated these suggestions into the lead. Holiday56 (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mickey, whom the family had previously family befriended – I'm assuming the second "family" shouldn't be there?
- Fixed. Holiday56 (talk)
Despite airing as a part of the show's third season, it was actually produced as the twelfth episode of its second season, hence bearing the production code 2ASA12 – the reference given for this is the episode itself, but I'm not sure how the episode could provide this information.
- The production information/code is listed in the last frame of the episode's ending credits. Holiday56 (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Megan Mullally, who voices the character Aunt Gayle in the series,[5] also guests in the episode – awkward wording; perhaps "also makes a guest appearance in the episode"?
- Done. Holiday56 (talk)
Is there any information on the episode's ratings as compared to other networks? Its performance is given in relation to other Animation Domination programs, but if the information is available it would be more valuable to note how it performed against other shows and networks that night.
- TV by the Numbers gives information on the NBC and CBS programs which it aired alongside the episode – incorporated that into the section. Holiday56 (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Other than that, the article is in great shape in accordance with the GA criteria. Well done especially on writing in a very clear manner that makes it easy for non-viewers (such as myself) to understand the plot without any problems. Ping me once you've addressed the issues above or if you have any other questions or comments. :) 97198 (talk) 13:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@97198: Thanks for the review! Hope I've addressed all your comments, and feel free to inform me if anything else needs clarification. Holiday56 (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great work, and thanks for the speedy response! I'll go ahead and promote the article now. 97198 (talk) 15:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bob Fires the Kids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140606230446/http://www.fox.com/bobsburgers/recaps/season-3/episode-3/ to http://www.fox.com/bobsburgers/recaps/season-3/episode-3/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]