Talk:Birmingham–Southern College/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

This college was nominated under Criteria A & C

'Rankings' in Introduction - citations for

The string of rankings and ratings given the in opening paragraphs have no citationbs or reference links. Such information should always be verified and especially so where claims of comparative merit are being made. The article will be tagged unless these omissions are rectified. Plutonium27 (talk) 03:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Work

• I removed most of the bragging and put a generic 'highly-ranked' noted under academics with a link to the college's page of accolades. Let them speak for themselves. I also went ahead and collected the academic sections under one heading and moved it ahead of "social traditions" and the like. I changed the list of every major and minor offered into paragraph form to reduce the amount of scrolling. This could easily be nixed. I did delete a section on the "Honor Council" because it struck me as trivia. As far as I know every institution of higher learning has an equivalent body with more or less similar aims and powers. There's a lot more that could be done if anyone wants to jump in. --Dystopos (talk) 04:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Conflict of interest: change to Campus section

I am reporting my potential conflict of interest because I made edits. I am an employee of Birmingham-Southern College. Editing Wikipedia (or public relations more generally) is not part of my job and was not encouraged by my employer in any way. I made two edits on October 31. I made no substantial changes to content or tone. I simply clarified grammar and moved the content of a section about a specific spot on campus to the Campus section because I was confused by the article as written. Rscragun (talk) 20:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)