This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
@Scope creep, please do not remove an academic notability tag without first trying to justify why and reach concensus. With an h-factor of 28, no significant awards and unclear academic he is not close to any of WP:NPROF. Ldm1954 (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Ldm1954: How goes it? I did justify it by removing the tag. I'm the only person that seems to the service the cat:nn category and have long experience at both NPP and AFC dealing with academics. The notability tag is highly subjective at best. The man has four papers with >100 citations and one with 77 so its close to borderline notable at a rough guess. I think it is borderline and better to keep it. If you don't think the guy is non-notable, send it to AFD, instead of choking up the category. There is almost 1200 articles with that tag for this month alone and there is only two folk servicing that category as far as I know. So if I come along and remove, I'm likely to be the only person to look at the article. If you post the note back, I will send it to Afd. scope_creepTalk16:51, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
