Jump to content

Talk:Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

frontal org

[edit]

Yappy2bhere, The source nowhere says "frontal" org. and that is her statement, discuss on talk your concerns. Do not add WP:OR--DBigXray 09:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


In December, 2019 Mahajan said that BJYM would publicize the work of the Modi government at the grassroots level and on the social media.[1]

References

  1. ^ "No competition to Narendra Modi as PM: Arun Jaitley tells Yuva Morcha members". The Economic Times. 2018-12-15. Retrieved 2019-05-29.

Yappy2bhere, where does Mahajan state what you are writing ? please share the exact lines. --DBigXray 10:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source nowhere says that the "BJYM hopes to play a major role" in anything, yet that's what you wrote and "supported" with the source. What the source does say, exactly, is that "[Mahajan] said the BJYM will carry out campaign at the grassroots level and on the social media," presumably "to publicise the work of the Modi government at the grassroots level." Did you read the article? Did you read the revision before you reverted it? Evidently not. A diller, a dollar... Yappy2bhere (talk) 10:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yappy2bhere, It was there before i arrived. I merely tried copy editing it. So please do not blame me. We cannot add what you presume. please propose an acceptable version here on talk, in your own words. DBigXray 10:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense. Of course you're responsible -- it's your own edit, for chrissake! You removed what you thought should go, you kept what you thought should stay, and you tied it together with a fabrication. "We"? Is there a mouse in your pocket? What pray tell do I presume, and why can't it be added? (Sooner or later you'll have to read what you reverted.) Yappy2bhere (talk) 11:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yappy2bhere, keep yapping DBigXray 11:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So, no reason at all. Best restore it then. Yappy2bhere (talk) 11:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yappy2bhere, no, as I said above, the source does not state what you are adding into the article. suggest an acceptable version that the source supports or take the highway. DBigXray 11:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sooner or later you'll have to read what you reverted. Yappy2bhere (talk) 11:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]