Talk:Bhai Bhaiya Aur Brother

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian television workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in June 2012.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 09:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bhai Bhaiya Aur Brother → Bhai Bhaiya aur Brother!!! – it is the name of the show.Boseritwik (talk) 20:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. No rationale in terms of WP:AT. MOS:TM probably also relevant. Andrewa (talk) 06:43, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Andrewa. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 08:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

References

I've just tagged this with {{unreferenced}}. However, a quick look at the edit history reveals that a previous version did include some refs. -- Trevj (talk) 07:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]