Talk:Benton City – Kiona Bridge/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 14:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: AdmrBoltz
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 14:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with the other FAs)
![]() Check for WP:RS: Cross-checked with the other FAs: Interstate 70 in West Virginia & Interstate 80 Business (Wendover)
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() Thorough check on Google in parallel with criteria 2. Cross-checked with the other FAs: Interstate 70 in West Virginia & Interstate 80 Business (Wendover)
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license) & (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
I think the lead can be improved in order to provide an accessible overview and to give relative emphasis to the Earlier spans.I think the first sentence of the lead can be improved.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. AdmrBoltz, please feel free to strike out any recommendation from this review which you think will not help in improving the article which is our main aim here. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 14:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Seabuckthorn: These changes should be addressed with the following change. Thanks :) --AdmrBoltz 14:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks
--Seabuckthorn ♥ 15:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 15:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)