Jump to content

Talk:Benishangul-Gumuz Region

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

name

[edit]

How did the spelling "Gumaz" make it in here? Since it is linked like that now in many places I used it grudgingly in my own links, but I have never seen this anywhere else. The name refers of course to the Gumuz people and I see no reason why it should not be spelled like this. --Landroving Linguist 22:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Benishangul-Gumuz Region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Benishangul-Gumuz Region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any explanation why this region uses the Pan-Arabic flag scheme

[edit]
Flag of Hejaz 1917
Flag of the Ba'ath Party
Flag of Sudan
Flag of the Benishangul-Gumuz Region

Besides the usage of Pan-African colours in a coincidetally similar scheme to Pan-Arab colors, the flag of region also appears similar to Pan-Arabic Flags with the triangle and color scheme appearing similar to Pan-Arabic Flag, with so much similarity that it can not be simply overruled with simple "it just appears similar" type of arguement.

As I know neither Berta people or Gumuz people are Arabic nor Arabised, is there reason why flag appears very and pretty much deliberately similar to Arabic flag scheme? Cactus Ronin (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]