Talk:Bellary Rural Assembly constituency

India: Karnataka / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Merge Request

No consensus. (non-admin closure) ^Queen of _Hearts 19:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposing to merge this page with Bellary Assembly constituency. As per Election Commission of India - Constituency list, Bellary Rural constituency does not exit. During 2008 delimitation order, the original Bellary constituency was re-organized, and new Bellary City constituency was created. But no new Bellary Rural constituency was created. See 2008 Delimitation Order, 2023 Assembly Election Result and Karnataka Legistature, Members list - all indicate Assembly number 93 is named simply Bellary. --Sathiyaraj (talk) 09:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I guess it was created as Bellary Rural just to differentiate it from Bellary City, but all official sources only use the name Bellary. I support the merge to Bellary Assembly constituency. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This Constituency predominantly comprises of Rural Parts of Bellary. Election Commission picked short form of the name. The guidelines in Wikipedia state for WP:COMMONNAME: "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's 'official' name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources).". Have added News articles which address as Bellary Rural to defend my Comments. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 18:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Some of these news articles seem to have copied the first two sentences of the wiki article. But, many of them use "Bellary Rural" organically, which supports your argument. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Many news articles simply refer this constituency as Bellary. See [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]. Mainly, by having this page, Bellary Assembly constituency is categorized as defunct; which is not a fact. --Sathiyaraj (talk) 08:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this is a close call that could be argued either way (both the long and short names are in common use; short name is in official use). I've added some hatnotes to help distinguish the pages. That might also help to ensure that readers know that there is a current constituency sometimes (or frequently) called Bellamy. Rather than merge, it would also be possible to move the page in such a way that the common name is in the title, though the use of a disambiguator. So, for example, to move Bellary Rural Assembly constituency to Bellary Assembly constituency (2008–). Klbrain (talk) 10:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.