Talk:Bell 309 KingCobra

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

WPMILHIST Assessment

Good pics and specs; the article is a bit bottom-heavy though. That is to say, specs and details of model numbers and all this technical stuff is great, but the "main" content, particularly the introduction, needs to be cleaned up a bit. Right now, the introduction reads as introductory sentences to two separate articles, and short sentences at that. Expand upon how the two are related and why they're significant, for a start. LordAmeth 01:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above assessment is from before the Bell 309 was split off from the Bell YAH-63 to its own page. - BillCJ 00:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bell 409 section

Should the 409 section stay as a legacy thing or delete it? -Fnlayson 23:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and cut the 409 section down to a couple legacy sentences. Add info back if you want. - Fnlayson 00:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I didn't intend for the whole thing to stay, just hand't got around to redacting it yet. I'll look at it later, and see if there's anything else we can back. - BillCJ

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bell 309 KingCobra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070807001809/http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html to http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]