Talk:Before Midnight

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

NPR

http://www.npr.org/2013/05/19/184818250/one-couple-nearly-20-years-all-before-midnight This should be included. Aeroadam (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do you add an "External Link"? (It's changed since last time I edited, long ago.) The film's official site is here: http://sonyclassics.com/beforemidnight/site/ Dave Cullen (talk) 16:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce pre-release chat

Years later (2014), readers don't need extensive quotes from 2012 of Hawke or Delpy denying or hiding that they were working on the film at that time. It's out, people have seen it.Parkwells (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Before Midnight (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 00:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– Pageviews analysis shows that the 2013 film far exceeds the other two topics (and the disambiguation page) as seen here. Note that the 2013 film was at Before Midnight (film) until Before Midnight (1925 film) got created. We could also just have both the 1925 film and the novel linked in a hatnote at the 2013 film's article. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 20:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

slight Oppose - I don't see we gain much value in adding ambiguity in this case. We are also missing articles that I believe should be created, specifically for the 1933 film using this name, which was the first in a series of crime films featuring Ralph Bellamy as Inspector Steve Trent (followed by The Crime of Helen Stanley and Girl in Danger which do have articles and One Is Guilty which doesn't yet either). I believe we should keep this as WP:NOPRIMARY with clear titles for the films using the release years. -- Netoholic @ 17:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused. Are you disputing that the 2013 film is the primary topic? Did you see the pageviews analysis? It shows 2.2M pageviews since 7/1/2015, and only 35K were not for the 2013 film. WP:NOPRIMARY only applies if there is no primary topic. I support creating an article for the 1933 film too, but it's not going to affect the overall pageviews much. The 2013 film also satisfies long-term significance in being part of Linklater's Before trilogy as reflected in Google Scholar here. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't doubt the pageviews or the significance, I just don't see a major gain to be had from re-ambiguating the title. -- Netoholic @ 20:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support— The data shows this page's views exceed the others by far. On February 17, for example, this page had 1086, whereas the other three had 12, 9, and 5. This is overwhelmingly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —El Millo (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and El Millo. The film's primacy cannot be denied. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.